Connect with us

News desk

Chinese EV dominance hastens end of petrol engine era

Published

on

A Neta S electric car at the Shanghai Auto Show. Electric vehicles made up a quarter of car sales in China in 2022, a year-on-year increase of 94 percent
Share this:

This year’s Shanghai Auto Show signalled the end of the petrol engine era in China, as domestic electric vehicle brands drive change across the sector and leave foreign companies in the dust, analysts and industry insiders said.

Government support for EVs and growing interest from a vast consumer base has assured Chinese companies’ dominance of their home market, the world’s largest — and they are now beginning to set their sights overseas.

Shanghai has shown Chinese brands “can compete with all of the legacy automakers in every way — performance, quality, comfort, there’s nothing they can’t do”, said EV specialist Elliot Richards, joking he had seen “a lot of worried-looking German men wandering around”.

“I think this show marks the end of the internal combustion engine and the beginning of the EV era,” he added.

EV companies are well aware they are closing in on their fossil-fuelled predecessors.

“We regard high-end petrol vehicles such as BMW, Mercedes Benz and Audi as our main competitors,” William Li, CEO of the “Chinese Tesla” Nio, told AFP.

According to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, electric vehicles made up a quarter of car sales in the country in 2022, a year-on-year increase of 94 percent.

Despite a downturn across the global auto sector, Li said he thought EVs’ market share in China could increase to over 40 percent this year.

In Shanghai, dozens of new models were on display from new and legacy carmakers alike.

“The future is very much here now,” Mike Johnstone, a top executive at British luxury brand Lotus, told AFP.

“There’s a lot of proliferation of electrified products (in China), and it’s changing the entire market.”

– ‘Head start’ – 

China has dedicated huge resources to the industry.

“They skipped developing petrol engines because they can’t compete with the rest of the world,” said Richards.

“So they thought: ‘(With EVs) we can get a head start in front of everyone else’.”

The country began investing heavily in associated technology from the early 2000s.

“It’s ingrained in the nature of the country’s economic system: the Chinese government is very good at focusing resources on the industries it wants to grow,” Zeyi Yang wrote in MIT Technology Review.

Central and local authorities poured billions of dollars into subsidies and tax breaks, and allocated public transport contracts to EV companies.

The supporting infrastructure was built too — the government says there are now more than 5.8 million charging piles in China.

Guangdong province alone has around three times as many public chargers as the whole of the United States, according to Bloomberg data.

“In general, there are still a lot of preferential policies… for the production and sale of electric vehicles,” said Nio’s Li, using as an example the waiving of expensive licence plate fees in some cities. 

– Innovation ecosystem –

Those policies have applied to foreign brands too. 

That tactic helped lure industry leader Tesla to Chinese shores, bolstering the sector’s reputation and sparking further competition.

Nowadays, more than 94 brands offer over 300 models in the Chinese market, “the most vibrant globally”, according to Counterpoint Research.

Some are smashing the cash barrier that put EVs beyond the means of the average consumer. 

In Shanghai, China’s Geely exhibited its boxy Panda Mini — including a bright yellow one with the phrase “what the duck” emblazoned on its side. 

The cheaper versions cost around $5,800.

In the future, homegrown technology could drive prices down even further.

Battery giant CATL has developed a cell that uses sodium instead of lithium ions, the former both more abundant and cheaper than the latter.

Just before the show opened CATL announced those batteries would be incorporated into domestic brand Chery’s cars.  

– Ripples overseas –

All this is being watched closely by foreign competitors.

Brands within the Chinese market are “setting the benchmark now” for others, Lotus’ Johnstone said.

And Chinese EV companies have already begun to make inroads abroad. 

The biggest of them, BYD, set up shop in Norway then expanded onwards, and others are following.

Geely-owned Zeekr’s Europe CEO, Spiros Fotinos, told AFP the technological sophistication of Chinese-made EVs is combatting old stereotypes around quality that foreign consumers might harbour.

“Consumers are seeing a lot of innovative safety technologies, with driver assist systems that are really cutting edge,” he said.

Richards though said Chinese automakers’ success in the West wasn’t “a done deal”, as they would have to adapt to the market.

“Karaoke machines in cars, for example — very popular in China, not so popular in Europe,” he said.

Johnstone insisted carmakers with “heritage and history” that welcomed in the electric era would remain competitive. 

“Brands that have been around for a number of years… will continue to live in the future as well,” he said. 

Share this:

News desk

US Congress to take on TikTok ban bill — again

Published

on

By

TikTok est depuis plusieurs mois dans le collimateur des autorités américaines, de nombreux responsables estimant que la plateforme de vidéos courtes et divertissantes permet à Pékin d'espionner et de manipuler ses 170 millions d'utilisateurs aux Etats-Unis
Share this:

The US House of Representatives will again vote Saturday on a bill that would force TikTok to divest from Chinese parent company ByteDance or face a nationwide ban.

The measure has been written into a massive $61 billion aid bill for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, which could ease its passage in both chambers of the US Congress.

Under the bill, ByteDance would have to sell the app within a few months or be excluded from Apple and Google’s app stores in the United States.

It would also give the US president the authority to designate other applications as a threat to national security if they are controlled by a country deemed hostile.

TikTok slammed the bill, saying it would hurt the US economy and undermine free speech. 

“It is unfortunate that the House of Representatives is using the cover of important foreign and humanitarian assistance to once again jam through a ban bill,” a company spokesman said.

He added a ban would “trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans, devastate 7 million businesses, and shutter a platform that contributes $24 billion to the US economy annually.”

Western officials have voiced alarm over the popularity of TikTok with young people, alleging that it is subservient to Beijing and a conduit to spread propaganda, claims denied by the company and Beijing.

Joe Biden reiterated his concerns about TikTok during a phone call with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in early April.

The House of Representatives last month approved a similar bill cracking down on TikTok, but the measure got held up in the Senate.

Share this:
Continue Reading

News desk

Taiwan chip giant TSMC’s profits surge on AI demand

Published

on

By

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company -- whose clients include Apple and Nvidia -- controls more than half the world's output of silicon wafers
Share this:

Taiwanese semiconductor giant TSMC announced Thursday a nearly 9 percent increase in net profits in the first quarter of 2024, buoyed by global demand for its microchips used to power everything from mobile phones to AI technology.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company — whose clients include Apple and Nvidia — controls more than half the world’s output of silicon chips, which have been called the “lifeblood” of the modern world.

The company said Thursday its net profit increased 8.9 percent on-year in January-March to NT$225.4 billion ($6.97 billion) compared to NT$206.9 billion in the same period last year. 

First-quarter revenues also rose 13 percent year-on-year to $18.87 billion, it said.

CFO Wendell Huang also said during an earnings call Thursday that TSMC expects its second-quarter revenues to increase by 27.6 percent.

TSMC, which produces some of the most advanced microchips in the world, dominates the chip-making industry, as well as its customer US-based Nvidia. 

The bulk of its fabrication plants making its most high-tech products are based in Taiwan, a self-ruled island that is claimed by neighbouring China — which has in recent years ramped up political and military pressures on Taipei. 

With a supply chain so vulnerable to shocks, customers — as well as governments concerned about critical supplies — have called for the firm to move more chip production lines off the island, which is also prone to natural disasters like earthquakes. 

Earlier this month, a massive magnitude-7.4 quake hit Taiwan and “a certain number of wafers in process were impacted and had to be scrapped”, Huang said. 

“But we expect most of the lost production to be recovered in the second quarter and thus minimum impact to the second quarter revenue,” he said. 

– ‘Significant progress’ –

The firm had also earlier this month announced plans to build a third semiconductor factory in Arizona — adding to the two fabrication units already in progress there. 

The preliminary agreement with the US Commerce Department — tied to a major investment law called the Chips and Science Act — would see TSMC receiving up to $6.6 billion in direct funding from the US government. 

That would raise its total investment in the United States to $65 billion.

“In Arizona, we have received the strong commitment and support from our US customers and plan to build three fabs… We have made significant progress in our first fab, which has already entered engineering wafer production in April,” said CC Wei, the company’s CEO.

“We are well on track for volume production in first half of 2025.”

He added that the second fab in Arizona has been upgraded “to utilise 2-nanometre technologies to support the strong AI-related demand in addition to the previously announced 3-nanometre” chips. 

TSMC’s projects in Arizona have faced some obstacles in the past year, which the company had attributed to a lack of human resources, as making microchips requires a highly specialised skillset. 

But if successful, the TSMC fabs in Arizona would be the “first time” that super-advanced chips will be made on American soil, said US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo earlier this month. 

The company had also in February launched a new $8.6 billion plant in the southern Japanese island of Kyushu — a coup for Japan as it vies with the United States and Europe to woo semiconductor firms with huge subsidies.

It is also planning another facility in Kumamoto for more advanced chips.

Share this:
Continue Reading

News desk

Meta shouldn’t force users to pay for data protection: EU watchdog

Published

on

By

Meta in November launched a 'pay or consent' system -- a model that has faced several challenges
Share this:

Facebook owner Meta and other online platforms must not force users to pay for the right to data protection enshrined in EU law when offering ad-free subscriptions, the European data regulator said Wednesday. 

“Online platforms should give users a real choice when employing ‘consent or pay’ models,” the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) chair Anu Talus said in a statement. 

“The models we have today usually require individuals to either give away all their data or to pay,” she said. “As a result, most users consent to the processing in order to use a service, and they do not understand the full implications of their choices.”

Meta in November launched a “pay or consent” system allowing users to withhold use of their data for ad targeting in exchange for a monthly fee — a model that has faced several challenges from privacy and consumer advocates.

Meta has long profited from selling user data to advertisers but this business model has led to multiple battles with EU regulators over data privacy.

The latest announcement came after the data protection authorities of The Netherlands, Norway and the German state of Hamburg went to the EDPB for an opinion regarding the pay-or-consent model used by Meta.

The Silicon Valley company allows users of Instagram and Facebook in Europe to pay between 10 and 13 euros (around $11 and $14) a month to opt out of data sharing.

Meta pointed to an EU court ruling last year that it said opened the way for subscriptions as a “legally valid” option. “Today’s EDPB opinion does not alter that judgment and subscription for no ads complies with EU laws,” a Meta spokesperson said.

Meta is waiting for a decision on its model by the data privacy regulator in Ireland where the company is headquartered.

– ‘Binary choice’ –

All digital platforms must comply with the European Union’s mammoth general data protection regulation (GDPR), which has been at the root of EU court cases against Meta.

The EDPB in its opinion argued that Meta’s model was at odds with the GDPR’s requirement that consent for data use must be freely given.

“In most cases, it will not be possible for large online platforms to comply with the requirements for valid consent if they confront users only with a binary choice between consenting to processing of personal data for behavioural advertising purposes and paying a fee,” the opinion read.

The EDPB also warned the type of subscription service put forward by Meta “should not be the default way forward” for platforms.

It suggested that platforms should consider an alternative that would give users the right to reject being tracked for advertising purposes without the need to pay.

Privacy defenders welcomed the opinion.

“Overall, Meta is out of options in the EU. It must now give users a genuine yes/no option for personalised advertising,” said prominent online privacy activist Max Schrems.

“We know that ‘Pay or Okay’ shifts consent rates from about three percent to more than 99 percent — so it is as far from ‘freely given’ consent as North Korea is from a democracy,” said Schrems.

Tech lobby group CCIA however warned the EDPB risked “opening a Pandora’s Box”.

“Forcing businesses to offer services at a loss is unprecedented and sends the wrong signals,” said CCIA Europe’s senior policy manager, Claudia Canelles Quaroni.

“All companies should be able to offer paid-for versions of their services.”

Share this:
Continue Reading

Featured